Graeme Thickins on Tech

Reflections & analysis about innovation, technology, startups, investing, healthcare, and more .... with a focus on Minnesota, Land of 10,000 Lakes. Blogging continuously since 2005.

A Tribute to an American Entrepreneur

Gary Doan represented the best of any tech founder I’ve had the privilege of working with — and I’ve worked with scores and scores of  them over my three-decade+ career. Sadly, we lost Gary last week, and I feel like I’ve lost one of my best friends.

Even though I hadn’t seen him in a year or more, I had such a bond with him. We frequently chatted online… about tech, about local news, about national events. So learning of his passing was a shock to me. No – not our Gary!

But I have many great memories and stories. I wrote a lengthy post about him on LinkedIn today. In it, I referred to a full scan of a really great cover story that appeared in our local Minnesota Business magazine. Here it is as a PDF:

GaryDoan-MNBusinessArticle-2004

(That’s the cover you see at right.) Gary had just launched his third tech startup at that point. He pulled me into that startup soon after this story, and it was an amazing experience.

Please go read that full article above, and the LinkedIn post. And do comment there on LinkedIn if you knew Gary. He was an inspiration to many!

 

The Unconventional Path That Took a Small Midwest Startup to a Multi-Billion-Dollar Fintech Success

Its founders met at MBA school, faced some scary challenges over the years, but kept their eye on the consumer. Now valued at $3.5B+ on the Nasdaq, Sezzle isn’t done yet embedding value into its app and platform.

(Note: This post first appeared on the blog of Great North Ventures.)

image of the two Sezzle cofounders

Paul Paradis (left) and Charlie Youakim, Sezzle cofounders.

I first met cofounders Charlie Youakim and Paul Paradis in 2016, just months after they had launched Sezzle. They were part of a pitch session I’d organized at a conference held at the University of Minnesota Carlson School of Management, the very place where they’d earned their MBA degrees six years earlier. Of the six early-stage Minnesota startups pitching that day, three went on to significant success, as I wrote recently. But none quite like Sezzle. The name, by the way, is a combination of “sell” and “sizzle” – and indeed they have.

This is a story about their journey over the ten years since, as related to me by Paul Paradis, Sezzle cofounder and president, with whom I had the pleasure of reconnecting at a founders dinner sponsored by Great North Ventures. Soon after, I arranged a sit-down with him to hear about many of the fascinating moments from the eventful journey of this super-successful startup.

“Sezzle in many ways is putting Minnesota’s fintech scene on the map,” said Rob Weber, managing partner of Great North Ventures. “And there are several more emerging embedded fintech startups focusing on a variety of markets that certainly can be inspired by their story.”

The Sezzle story begins with how Paul met and bonded with his cofounder, Charlie Youakim, the company’s CEO.

The Ping-Pong Partnership
Long before Sezzle became one of Minnesota’s most successful technology companies – and eventually a publicly traded Nasdaq fintech valued in the billions – its two cofounders were simply graduate students at Carlson trying to navigate one of the most chaotic economic periods in modern history.

Paradis and Youakim met at Carlson between 2008 and 2010, right in the middle of the financial crisis. Paradis recalls professors abandoning their planned curriculum to discuss the real-world collapse unfolding in front of them.

“All of our finance classes, the teacher would say, ‘Put your books away. We’re just going to talk about what’s going on right now,’” Paradis said. They had an education in finance they weren’t expecting when they signed up.

The two became close while working together in Carlson’s Consulting Enterprise program on a project for the Itasca Project, studying employment growth in the Twin Cities region. But it wasn’t just classroom collaboration that bonded them. “We became really good friends and ended up just becoming ping-pong obsessed,” Paradis said. “We would just play ping pong all the time together.”

Those early years also shaped their entrepreneurial instincts. Jobs were scarce. Internships had dried up. Traditional career paths suddenly looked fragile.

“I had the pleasure of working with and supporting Charlie and Paul as students. Both were highly engaged and did outstanding work,” said Phil Miller, now Assistant Dean at the Carlson School. “Their class really struggled with the depths of the financial crisis, but I suspect that helped them both in the long term. Paul was a motivated student, and we were able to connect him to a business development role post-graduation. Charlie was a driven founder from the beginning, passing up a traditional internship to work on the code base and business model for what became his first startup. Both of those journeys seem to have given them valuable experience on how they wanted their partnership in Sezzle to go. It’s been a joy to see them struggle through early challenges to the success they’re currently seeing.”

Youakim, a University of Minnesota engineering graduate and former software engineer, moved to Charlotte, North Carolina after business school and cofounded a parking technology startup called Passport. The company raised serious venture capital and grew quickly, but eventually Youakim and his cousin – his cofounder – had a falling out. He returned to Minnesota at the end of 2015 looking for a fresh start.

“He had a big chip on his shoulder,” Paradis said. “He wanted to show that he had something more in him.” Paradis, meanwhile, was growing restless in the consulting world. When Youakim called with the idea of building something new together, the timing was perfect.

The First Idea Failed Fast
The original version of Sezzle looked nothing like the company consumers know today. The founders initially believed they could reinvent ACH bank payments by authenticating bank accounts instantly, allowing merchants to avoid expensive credit card fees while still offering consumers cash-back rewards.

The concept attracted investors quickly. Thanks largely to Youakim’s reputation from Passport, Sezzle raised roughly $1.8 million in seed funding before launching its product – an unusually large pre-launch round for a Minnesota startup at the time. Investors included local angels, former Passport backers, a Belgian VC firm, and even a Chinese seed-stage investor.

But once the product launched in early 2017, the founders quickly realized they had a problem. “The small merchants didn’t care about saving 150 basis points on processing,” Paradis said. “They cared about growing their business. That’s number one, two, three, four, five.”

Consumer adoption was even worse. Even offering unsustainable cash-back incentives of 5% or 10% barely moved usage rates. After only two months in market, Youakim concluded the model was not working.

“He’s very good at that,” Paradis said of his cofounder’s willingness to take quick, decisive action. “In this case, it was a pivot, but more broadly, Charlie diagnoses a problem and immediately sets out to fix it. The rest of us were saying, ‘We raised all this money on this idea. It’s only been two months.’”

At the same time, Sezzle was pursuing a spot in the Techstars Target accelerator program in Minneapolis. The company reached the final interview stage – right as the team was internally debating whether to abandon its original business model. “We were literally debating whether to pitch the old idea or the new idea,” Paradis said.

They did not get selected. In hindsight, it may have been one of the best things that ever happened to the company.

Discovering Buy Now, Pay Later
As Sezzle searched for a new direction, Youakim noticed something interesting happening overseas. A fast-growing Australian startup called Afterpay was exploding in popularity with younger consumers. At the time, the “buy now, pay later” (BNPL) category barely existed in the United States. Another company, Affirm, focused only on large purchases like furniture and fitness equipment. But Afterpay had found something different: smaller installment payments that appealed to younger consumers wary of traditional credit cards.

Paradis and Youakim realized the U.S. market shared many of the same demographic trends as Australia, especially after the CARD Act of 2009 made it harder for young adults to get credit cards.

“We saw a bunch of Australian merchants promoting the hell out of Afterpay,” Paradis recalled. “And Charlie said Australia has always been a great test market for new tech because consumers behave very similarly to the U.S.”

The founders also discovered something critically important from regulators: if they structured the product as four payments or fewer, they could avoid many traditional lending regulations. “That’s when we said, okay,” Paradis said.

Their first sales strategy was surprisingly simple. “We started contacting all of Afterpay’s merchant customers that also sold in the U.S.,” Paradis said. “We basically pitched ourselves as ‘the Afterpay for the U.S.’”

It worked almost immediately. Merchant signups surged. And then Afterpay itself came calling.

“You Can Join Us or Compete Against Us”
Afterpay invited the Sezzle founders to San Francisco with a blunt proposition. “You can either join us or compete against us,” Paradis recalled. The Australian company offered what Paradis described as a lowball acquisition offer. Sezzle declined.

Within months, Afterpay officially entered the U.S. market with major retailers including Urban Outfitters and Revolve. Suddenly, Sezzle found itself in a brutal competitive battle against much larger, better-funded rivals.

The timing could hardly have been worse. Sezzle’s Series A financing nearly collapsed when a Chicago VC pulled its term sheet after Afterpay announced its U.S. expansion.

“That was a big blow,” Paradis said. The company needed a Plan B. Youakim provided it personally. He still owned a significant stake in Passport, his previous startup. When Passport investors offered to buy his shares during a new financing round, he sold all of his ownership and poured most of the proceeds into Sezzle. “He led the Series A himself,” Paradis said.

That decision would later become enormously important. Today, Youakim still owns a substantial portion of Sezzle, thanks partly to that personal investment during the company’s most vulnerable period.

Why Stay in Minnesota?
As Sezzle gained traction, the founders encountered another challenge familiar to many Midwest startups: coastal investors questioning why the company was based in Minneapolis.

“We’d go out to New York or San Francisco, and they’d all ask, ‘Why are you in Minneapolis?’” Paradis said. Some investors openly encouraged the company to relocate. Fundraising, especially for a fintech lender, proved much harder from Minnesota than it would have been in Silicon Valley or New York.

But Paradis says staying in Minnesota ultimately became one of Sezzle’s defining characteristics. “We were one of the only hot tech startups in town,” he said. “So if you wanted to work for a company like that, we had the buzz.”

The company recruited heavily from the University of Minnesota and Macalester College. Paradis also credits Youakim personally for choosing not to relocate the company.

“I have to give a lot of love to Charlie for that,” Paradis said. “I think he would have moved us, and he didn’t, primarily because of me. My family was here. Of course, his family was here, too, but he didn’t have kids yet. My second daughter was born the week I joined Sezzle full-time, and my wife worked for 3M. So I was much more tied down here than he was.”

The Australia Gamble
Despite improving traction, Sezzle still struggled to raise a strong Series B round in the U.S. Then an unexpected opportunity appeared. An Australian equity analyst visiting Minneapolis asked a simple question: Why not go public in Australia instead? That was a way to raise significant funds.

Australian investors already understood buy now, pay later because of Afterpay’s success. Better yet, Australia’s venture capital ecosystem was far less developed, making public listings more common for emerging tech companies. It was clearly an intriguing idea.

Youakim flew to Australia for a non-deal roadshow arranged by investment bank Ord Minnett. “He called me and said, ‘Paul, we’re doing it,’” Paradis recalled. “We were going to be able to raise a lot more money and at a much better valuation.”

The IPO process became a whirlwind. Paradis joined Youakim and Sezzle’s CFO for investor meetings across Sydney, Melbourne, and Hong Kong. At one point, after flying overnight to Hong Kong, the team showered in the airport before heading directly into all-day investor meetings in 100-degree heat and humidity. “It was incredible,” Paradis said. “We were actually planning to take a helicopter to Macau that night to celebrate, but Charlie fell asleep at the dinner table after we ate Peking Duck at the Mandarin Oriental. Still, it was a great ending to a great day.”

The company successfully listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) in July 2019.

The Crash
For a time, everything seemed to be working. Sezzle raised additional capital. The buy now, pay later market exploded globally. Affirm went public in the U.S., and markets soared during the pandemic-era fintech boom.

Then the cycle reversed – violently. Afterpay sold to Block for $39 billion in 2021, briefly fueling optimism that Sezzle might also achieve a major acquisition or Nasdaq listing. But by late 2021, fintech markets were collapsing.

Sezzle pursued both an IPO and acquisition discussions simultaneously. Nearly every potential acquirer backed away as markets cratered. Except one: Zip, a BNPL company based in Sydney.

The two companies publicly announced a merger. At the same time, Sezzle itself was under severe pressure. The company cut international expansion plans, terminated merchant partnerships, and laid off roughly a quarter of its staff. Its market capitalization collapsed from roughly $1.5 billion to just $40 million.

Nonetheless, Sezzle chose not to close the Zip deal. However, it produced a crucial lifeline: an $8 million breakup fee. Sezzle used that money to stabilize operations and race toward profitability instead of raising additional capital in a terrible market.

“We just slowly started digging ourselves out of the hole,” Paradis said.

Reinventing the Company Again
Sezzle’s eventual recovery required another strategic pivot. The merchant business had become hypercompetitive. Instead of relying solely on merchant integrations, the company shifted toward direct consumer relationships. Sezzle decided to focus on the subprime segment of the consumer market.

It launched subscription offerings, expanded its mobile app, and introduced products like Sezzle Anywhere and On Demand. The company also rebuilt carefully and efficiently.

Today, Sezzle employs roughly 500 people globally, including about 100 in the Twin Cities and approximately 250 in South America, particularly Bogotá, Colombia.

“We’ve found incredible talent there,” Paradis said. “Same time zone, highly educated, strong English skills – and much more efficient from a cost standpoint.”

Sezzle remains headquartered in downtown Minneapolis in the historic Dayton’s building, though like many tech companies it now operates largely remotely.

And despite Youakim now spending much of his time in Puerto Rico, a strategic location between Minneapolis and Bogotá, Paradis says Minnesota still matters deeply to the company’s identity. “He’s here every other week,” Paradis said. “His family’s here. Our roots are here.”

The company listed on the Nasdaq (Symbol: SEZL) in August 2023. It voluntarily delisted from the ASX, and its final day of trading on the Australian exchange was January 12, 2024.

Today, with Sezzle once again thriving, the company stands as one of the most remarkable startup success stories ever produced by Minnesota’s technology ecosystem – a decade-long journey shaped by pivots, near-collapse moments, international gambles, and an unusually stubborn commitment to building a major fintech company far from Silicon Valley.

A Strategy Well Executed
“Charlie and Paul’s ability to execute was very clear from the first time we met with them in January 2018,” said Rob Weber of Great North Ventures. “What was unclear in our initial meetings was how they were going to be able to compete against larger, more well-funded rivals Affirm, Afterpay, and Klarna. But their ability to adapt their strategy over time has been super impressive to watch.” He noted that it was Sezzle’s proprietary business intelligence system that enabled them to accomplish “far more with far less” than their rivals. “We benefited from that approach with our own startup, NativeX, before we became VCs. So we know what a difference it can make.”

Buy now, pay later (BNPL) in its earliest forms took roots through embedded partnerships across a wide range of merchant checkout processes. “It started off as a niche play, but is now emerging as core financial infrastructure,” said Weber, which he wrote about recently.

Recent Stellar Results
Sezzle reported a very strong Q1 2026 with 29.2% revenue growth, gross margins of 74%, net income of $51.3M, and adjusted EBITDA of $71.1M. Management raised full-year guidance, with revenue growth now expected to be 30%–35%, adjusted net income to $180M, and adjusted EPS to $5.10. Key drivers included improving credit performance, higher consumer engagement, and subscriber growth up 44k to 714k.

The company said product expansion is underway, including Pay-in-5, a virtual card in Canada, enhanced long-term lending, Sezzle Mobile on AT&T, and roadmap items such as deposit accounts and checking, positioning Sezzle to become an all-in-one services platform for value-focused consumers.

The company is embedding AI across support, product, and operations to increase efficiency and scale. And it is pursuing a bank charter, with an application targeted for this year, to improve regulatory defensibility and long-term economics.

“It’s going to be an exciting year for Sezzle,” said CEO Charlie Youakim on the earnings call. “2025 was about enhancing our current consumer ecosystem. We improved the app experience, expanded engagement features, leaned back into higher-value consumers, and continue to give our users more reasons to come back to Sezzle. But in 2026, we’re pushing that strategy further. We’re moving beyond being a product consumers think about only at checkout.”

He sums it up this way: “We’re building an all-in-one services platform for the value-focused consumer. The strategic goal is to make Sezzle more useful in more moments. The more value we provide, the more reasons consumers have to come back… We should see consumers using Sezzle more often across more merchants and across more use cases. That’s exactly what we saw in the first quarter.”

As the month of May 2026 came to an end, investment site Seeking Alpha named Sezzle the best performing financial stock of the month based on one month price performance percentage. In addition, that same week, another site published this article: Sezzle Tops the List of Best All-in-One Fintech Apps of 2026.

Learn more about this amazing fintech success story at Sezzle.com.

 

The Day Minnesota Became a Fintech Startup Hotbed

There was definitely some tension in the air, as six startups were about to pitch on stage. One of them had never even pitched in public before. Little did three of them know what this day would come to mean, and how their lives would change over the ensuing years.

Illustration depicting fintech applications around a banner saying "MN Fintech Pioneers"

The scene was an auditorium at the University of Minnesota’s Carlson Business School, at a “Financial & Retail Analytics” conference we called FARCON. It was almost ten years ago – August 2016, to be exact. I was hosting the pitch session. This little-remembered Startup Showcase, as we called it, quietly captured a pattern that would come to define Minnesota’s role in fintech and commerce innovation.

On that stage pitching were Sezzle, GrocerKey, and LiveGiveSave. A year later, at FARCON  2017 at the U’s McNamara Alumni Center, a Techstars cohort startup named Branch Messenger would pitch as well.

None of these companies was framed as “fintech” at the time. They were analytics companies. Retail companies. Behavior companies. But in hindsight, they were all working on the same underlying problem: how money moves through everyday consumer and workforce interactions.

Sezzle went on to pivot to buy now, pay later (BNPL). It did not invent it, but localized and operationalized it for a specific segment, aligning tightly with U.S. retail behavior and merchant needs. Branch, then a workforce communications platform, sat directly on top of shift work, payroll, shift cycles, and employee engagement – precisely the layer that would later enable earned wage access. LiveGiveSave, later rebranded as Spave, connected spending to saving and giving, anticipating today’s wave of embedded and values-driven financial tools. And GrocerKey built the infrastructure for local grocery e-commerce, an early signal of the digitization of everyday retail.

What ties these companies together is not category creation, but context. Each emerged from Minnesota’s unique intersection of large-scale retail, enterprise systems, and applied analytics. They didn’t start by trying to disrupt finance. They started by solving practical problems in online life and commerce – then extended into financial layers.

The outcomes were equally telling. Sezzle scaled into a publicly traded company, now with a whopping market capitalization of more than $2B (Nasdaq: SEZL). Branch evolved into a leading earned-wage access platform, growing rapidly and now partnered with Stripe. GrocerKey (which was based in Madison WI with Minnesota operations) exited to a strategic buyer, a success for the founding team. And Spave followed a less conventional path: a meaningful exit followed by the founder buying back the name and rights to certain markets to continue building the platform and operating the company independently.

Together, as we look back today, it’s quite clear these four companies can stand proudly as early Minnesota fintech pioneers. Big kudos to them!

We can be sure, however, that much more fintech innovation is yet to come in our state. Stay tuned!

The Coming $1-Trillion Space Economy, and How Minnesota Plays Into It

Our state may not launch rockets, but it quietly builds the technologies that make the growing space economy possible.

Minnesota actually has a surprisingly deep set of companies connected to the space industry. Many state firms provide materials, electronics, engineering services, sensors, and manufacturing that go into spacecraft, satellites, and launch systems used by organizations such as NASA, SpaceX, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin.

Several notable Minnesota companies are directly or indirectly participating in the space economy. Here are just some of the state’s companies with space industry connections

1. ION Corporation (Eden Prairie) – Aerospace engineering and testing company doing direct NASA mission work.
2. Stratasys (Eden Prairie – Nasdaq: SSYS) – 3D printing is increasingly used for rocket engines, brackets, and satellite components.
3. QuesTek Innovations (has a facility in Waconia) – Advanced alloys and materials for rocket engines and extreme thermal environments.
4. Collins Aerospace (Burnsville) – Part of Raytheon Technologies. Collins systems are used in satellites, spacecraft navigation, and communications payloads.
5. Northrop Grumman (facility in Plymouth) – Global aerospace contractor. Minnesota operations contribute to electronics, engineering, and mission systems.
6. BAE Systems (Minneapolis) – Builds radiation-hardened electronics, sensors, and spacecraft avionics used in many satellite systems.
7. Chandler Industries (Minneapolis) – Supplies high-precision components used in spacecraft assemblies and aerospace hardware.
8. EarthDaily Analytics (U.S. operations in Maple Grove) – Uses satellite data and space-based imaging analytics for agriculture and climate intelligence, an important part of the satellite data economy.
9. Timmaron Group (Minneapolis and Silicon Valley) – Was a solution architect in the development of Starlink’s satellite system.

An Emerging Space Infrastructure Project

The Minnesota Aerospace Complex in Rosemount is a planned $1+ billion hypersonic testing and aerospace facility. Potential uses will be testing hypersonic vehicles, spacecraft reentry materials, and advanced propulsion systems. If completed, it could become one of the largest aerospace testing facilities in the U.S. (More here.)

Three Main Sectors

These Minnesota sectors feed the space industry:
• Advanced manufacturing: Minnesota has strong precision machining and electronics supply chains used by aerospace primes.
• Robotics & autonomy: Companies building robotics and AI systems for inspection, drones, and autonomous vehicles may transition to space applications.
• Satellite analytics & AI: Minnesota’s agtech and geospatial analytics firms increasingly rely on satellite data.

Little-Known Companies, But Some Big Ones, Too

Minnesota doesn’t yet have a large cluster of rocket startups, but it does have a quiet ecosystem of organizations connected to the space economy — often through satellites, materials science, robotics, geospatial data, and advanced manufacturing. Think the supply chain of space.

In geospatial and satellite data, consider Descartes Labs. It was founded in New Mexico but maintains a significant Minneapolis engineering presence. (Note: In 2024, Descartes Labs was acquired by EarthDaily Analytics, which has operations in Maple Grove.) It uses satellite imagery and AI to analyze agriculture, climate, and geopolitics. Its customers include U.S. government agencies and global enterprises. It works with data from NASA, ESA, and commercial satellite constellations. Satellite data analytics is one of the fastest-growing segments of the space economy.

In the category of robotics, sensors, and autonomy, don’t forget about a major tech firm like Seagate Technology (Nasdaq: STX) with its work in advanced data storage R&D. Storage systems are used in satellite ground systems and data infrastructure. Its technology supports satellite data processing pipelines.

Another publicly traded firm is SkyWater Technology (Nasdaq: SKYT), a Bloomington-based semiconductor foundry. It produces radiation-tolerant chips and advanced microelectronics. Radiation-tolerant semiconductors are essential for satellites and deep-space missions.

Why Minnesota Could Become a Space Supply-Chain Hub

Thus, Minnesota has many ingredients needed for space-industry infrastructure. Again, these are our main strengths: 1) advanced manufacturing – including precision machining and aerospace components, 2) materials science – extreme-environment materials and additive manufacturing, 3) semiconductors – specifically radiation-hardened electronics, and 4) AI and geospatial analytics – which is turning satellite data into usable insights.

A Trillion-Dollar Industry On the Verge of Breaking Out

For a further perspective in the space industry, and how 2026 could be the year things really take off (pun intended). see this recent blog post from my client Timmaron Group. (SpaceX IPO, anyone?)

And this recent WSJ article will provide some further perspective: The Space Economy Is Mission-Critical. Here’s What Leaders Need to Know.

——

Postscript: The list of Minnesota companies above is not intended to be all-inclusive. Know of another company doing space-related work here in our state? If so, tell me in the comments.

 

A Fascinating Saga Continues: AI Disrupting Enterprise Software

This past week was another brutal one for software companies, as evidenced by the big stock declines you see here (as of market close on Feb 7). This week may have been better for some than the week before, but not by much. Some observers are starting to refer to what’s happening as the “SaaS apocalypse.” Fox Business called it a “$1 trillion rout in U.S. software giants” and labeled it “the software Armageddon.”

Just what exactly happened this first week of February to cause the latest shock to the industry? A single move by an AI company juggernaut. As Fast Company put it, one Anthropic update wiped billions off software stocks. It begins: “Investors fear Claude Cowork’s new agentic features threaten entire categories of SaaS tools.” The article continues:

“Tech workers have been worried for years about the AI tidal wave coming for their jobs, but their bosses are starting to worry now, too.

“Stocks plunged this week as fears escalated that AI advancements will take a bite out of business for many software, data, and professional services companies. The market losses are tied to updates to Anthropic’s AI-powered workplace productivity suite, Claude Cowork, which threatens to replace some software tools ubiquitous in the professional world.”

But despite many in the tech world piling on to the prevailing opinion that enterprise software is dead, there are a few voices speaking out with a viewpoint that all is not lost for the software industry. One example is cited in the closing paragraph of the above Fast Company article:

“Not everyone deeply invested in AI agrees. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang swatted away worries that AI would eat the traditional software industry after the stock bloodbath that began on Tuesday. ‘There’s this notion that the tool in the software industry is in decline, and will be replaced by AI,’ Huang said, emphasizing that relying on existing software tools makes more sense than reinventing the wheel. ‘It is the most illogical thing in the world, and time will prove itself.’ ”

Another skeptic is Steven Sinofsky, a former Microsoft exec who’s a board partner at Andreessen Horowitz (a16z). Here’s a (long) opinion piece he published this week: Death of Software. Nah. Additionally, an article in The Economist argued a bit against the prevailing dire view: Why software stocks are getting pummelled. Are investors overestimating the risk from AI? (May require a free subscription.)

And the Fox Business article cited above ends with this note: “Despite the stock market turbulence this week, the Dow Jones managed to cross the historic 50,000 level, underscoring the continued exuberance surrounding the AI race.”

For a fascinating, deep-dive analysis of the situation, Ignite Insights published this (very long) post on its Substack just days ago: The Great SaaS Unbundling. Where Software Value Actually Goes When Agents Arrive. (May require subscription.)

(Note: This post first appeared on the blog of my client Timmaron Group.)

« Older posts